Search found 260 matches
- Sun Jul 30 2023 3:20 pm
- Forum: Issues
- Topic: XCB Assert failure again
- Replies: 0
- Views: 18221
XCB Assert failure again
All, Everything is merged from tip of tip in LS-CS. RedDiamond, and basically anything written with CopperSpice and using the clipboard gets the following assertion. ASSERT: "m_timestamp[mode] == XCB_CURRENT_TIME || getSelectionOwner(atomForMode(mode)) == m_owner" in file /home/developer/g...
- Tue Jun 13 2023 3:58 pm
- Forum: User Support
- Topic: Markdown preview question
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4707
Markdown preview question
All, The documentation makes no mention of this, but given there is also DoxyPress, does one of the QTextBrowser type classes have a Markdown preview that simply isn't documented. I see setHtml() and setPlainText() all over the place but no setMarkdown() and no enum/bit flag to indicate text is Mark...
- Wed Apr 05 2023 8:02 pm
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Compilation error
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7806
Re: Compilation error
Just a follow-up. If you do not already have CopperSpice installed in a system directory, the current CMake process successfully builds. The files need to have the local directory tree in front when searching for includes though or corrupted builds due to header file changes will be an ongoing probl...
- Sun Apr 02 2023 10:10 pm
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Compilation error
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7806
Compilation error
I just pulled I think, 9, commits (whatever happened over past couple of days) into my fork of CopperSpice to update RPM branch. [137/3819] Building CXX object src/core/CMakeFiles/CsCore.dir/kernel/qvariant.cpp.o FAILED: src/core/CMakeFiles/CsCore.dir/kernel/qvariant.cpp.o /usr/bin/c++ @src/core/CMa...
- Fri Mar 10 2023 10:29 pm
- Forum: User Support
- Topic: CopperSpice on Arm - again
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12084
Re: CopperSpice on Arm - again
Okay, time to put a saddle on this dead horse and see if it will run. 1) Where is the roadmap posted these days? 2) Did CopperSpice on Arm work start? If so, how far along is it? I still don't see it on supported platforms. I'm asking because CopperSpice on ARM came up again just a couple hours ago....
- Thu Mar 09 2023 6:48 pm
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: RPM Packaging - what is thumping in the build root?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6438
Re: RPM Packaging - what is thumping in the build root?
I don't know what is causing the problem, but I finally tracked down the where. hexdump --canonical libCsCore1.8.so > ~/h.log 007e9f60 41 53 53 45 52 54 20 66 61 69 6c 75 72 65 20 69 |ASSERT failure i| 007e9f70 6e 20 25 73 3a 20 22 25 73 22 2c 20 66 69 6c 65 |n %s: "%s", file| 007e9f80 20 ...
- Wed Mar 08 2023 11:05 pm
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: RPM Packaging - what is thumping in the build root?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6438
RPM Packaging - what is thumping in the build root?
All, This ought to be stupid simple but I'm slamming my head against the wall to find it. Fork of CopperSpice project with [RPM branch](https://github.com/RolandHughes/copperspice/tree/RPM) so I can package the library in RPM form now that I have Debian working. I tried to be the least invasive poss...
- Mon Feb 27 2023 10:56 pm
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: RPATH and Fedora36
- Replies: 0
- Views: 22442
RPATH and Fedora36
All, I'm working on the RPM builds for the fork, having already submitted pull requests for the Debian packaging. Is there a legitimate reason this ends with .. set(CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH "${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/${CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR}/copperspice/bin:$ORIGIN/${CS_BIN_RPATH}:$ORIGIN/..") For...
- Tue Feb 07 2023 8:21 pm
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: Why no binaries for openSuSE 15.x?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5254
Re: Why no binaries for openSuSE 15.x?
Gospel truth the RPM for Fedora should work on OpenSuSE . . . you just need one from a version of Fedora that matches the OpenSuSE kernel version. Oh, wait, SuSE is rolling now as well . . . should "just work." All RPM based distros are derivatives of RedHat.
- Mon Jan 16 2023 6:44 pm
- Forum: Enhancements
- Topic: Daniel Bermond?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8308
Re: Daniel Bermond?
If you want to release your own Debian package, please do not use a name like the following: "copperspice-1.8.0-amd64.deb". This has already confused people on FreeBSD who thought the package was our official release. Just make some minor change to the package name so it is clear this is ...